Home/Implementation and evaluation
Implementation and evaluation

From first conversation to a system your team actually uses

Most ERP failures are not technical. They come from an unclear scope, weak master data, and a go-live that nobody was trained for. This page sets out how we scope, deliver and validate an engagement, and what to prepare before you ask for a quote.

Five named stagesWritten deliverablesPOC before commitmentPhased scope
On trials: we do not provide self-registered trial accounts. An unconfigured enterprise system tells you nothing about whether it fits your business. The evaluation path is a discovery session, a demonstration environment configured around your scenario, and a proof of concept on your critical processes.
Delivery method

Five stages, each with an output

Every stage ends with something written down and agreed, so the next one starts from facts rather than assumptions.

STAGE 01

Discovery and diagnosis

Inputs
Industry, entity and site structure, systems in use, the three problems that matter most, target time window.
Output
A written view of the current state, project boundary and priority order. No charge, no commitment.
STAGE 02

Blueprint and scope

Inputs
Key processes, master data rules, reporting definitions, integration list, deployment and security requirements.
Output
A signed-off blueprint: module combination, process maps, data model, interface list, phase-one scope and responsibilities.
STAGE 03

Build and migration

Inputs
Agreed blueprint, sample production data, access to the systems being integrated.
Output
Configured environment, agreed developments, migrated and reconciled master data, working interfaces, delivered in stages.
STAGE 04

Training and go-live

Inputs
Named key users, parallel-run data, cutover window and acceptance criteria.
Output
Trained users, documented procedures, a controlled parallel run and a go-live decision based on agreed criteria.
STAGE 05

Continuous support and further phases

Inputs
Post-go-live issues, new business requirements, change requests, performance data.
Output
Support and change process, periodic optimization, and a roadmap for extending the same master data foundation rather than rebuilding it.
Deliverables

What you should expect in writing

If a document is not on this list, ask who owns it before the project starts. Ambiguity here is where scope drift begins.

DocumentWhenWhy it matters
Current-state assessmentAfter discoveryRecords systems, data quality and process gaps; sets the project boundary.
Solution blueprintBefore buildFixes process maps, master data rules, reporting definitions and the phase-one scope.
Interface and development listBefore buildNames every integration and custom development, with owners and acceptance criteria.
Data migration planBefore migrationDefines cleansing rules, ownership and reconciliation method for master data.
Test and acceptance criteriaBefore go-liveTurns "it works" into checkable conditions for key processes and reports.
Training materials and cutover planBefore go-liveMakes adoption and handover repeatable instead of dependent on one consultant.
Implementation plan and written quoteAfter scope is confirmedStates schedule, responsibilities and commercial terms against an agreed scope.
Risk control

Four risks we plan for explicitly

RiskWhat it looks likeHow it is handled
Master data qualityDuplicate materials, inconsistent style codes, no agreed units or naming rules.Data rules and ownership fixed in the blueprint; a real sample is loaded and reconciled before go-live.
Scope creepNew requests appear mid-build with no impact assessment.Phase-one scope is written down; anything beyond it goes through a change process with cost and schedule impact.
Cutover disruptionParallel run never converges, or reports disagree at month end.Acceptance criteria, parallel run and reconciliation checkpoints are agreed before the cutover window.
Low adoptionKey users were never trained; teams return to spreadsheets.Named key users, role-based training and documented procedures are deliverables, not optional extras.
POC validation

Four things to test in the demonstration environment

Use real sample data. A proof of concept built on perfect demo data proves very little.

Master data

Load a real batch of materials, styles or customers and check coding rules, deduplication and import handling.

Critical end-to-end process

Run one or two painful flows, such as order to cash or purchase order to production receipt, from start to finish.

Reporting definitions

Have finance and operations reconcile the same sample data, so metric disagreements surface early.

Permissions and performance

Verify data isolation across your real organizational hierarchy and response times on commonly used reports.

FAQ

Before you request a quote

Do you offer a self-service trial account?

No. An empty ERP account, before master data, organization structures and processes are configured, shows very little. Instead we run a discovery session, prepare a demonstration environment configured around your scenario, and validate the critical processes in a proof of concept.

Do you have offices in Singapore or the United States?

We are based in Shanghai, China, and work with overseas teams remotely. Discovery and blueprint sessions are held by video call at mutually agreed times. If an on-site stage is required, it is scoped and agreed as part of the implementation plan rather than assumed.

How long does an implementation take?

It depends on the confirmed scope: number of entities, modules, data migration volume, integrations and training. We normally recommend a narrow first phase and set the schedule after blueprint sign-off, when assumptions can be replaced with a real work plan.

Can the system run on our own infrastructure?

Yes. Private and hybrid deployment are supported. Infrastructure, backup, access control and audit requirements are documented during the blueprint stage and form part of the delivery scope.

What does a proof of concept actually cover?

Four things: whether your master data can be loaded and governed; whether one or two critical processes run end to end; whether finance and operations agree on reporting definitions; and whether permissions and response times hold up at your organizational scale.

Start the evaluation

Request a discovery session

Including the points below lets the first conversation start at solution level instead of company introductions.

What to include in your email

  • Industry, main business and where your entities or factories are located
  • Entity, site and approximate user counts
  • Systems currently in use, and the three problems you want solved first
  • Deployment or data residency requirements, if any
  • Preferred time zone and a contact window for a video call

What you get back

  • A discovery conversation focused on current state and priorities
  • A proposed phase-one scope and a demonstration scenario
  • POC validation suggestions for your critical processes
  • A written implementation plan and quote once scope is confirmed

Email the team

Or write to contact@moanyun.cn

Understand the platform before comparing quotes

If you are still in the selection stage, review the module coverage and industry scenarios first. A clearer scope makes every vendor quote comparable.